Skip to content

Network Ninja

The Long Road to Cisco

  • Home
  • About
  • Legal Disclaimer
  • Archives

Less
More
Trim
Untrim
« Older
Home
Loading
Newer »

Tag Archive for 'CIR'

Enhanced Interior Gateway Routing Protocol – Scalable EIGRP – Scenario Two

Published
by
Deon Botha
on September 10, 2008
in BSCI, BSCI Questions, Certification and Cisco Systems
. 0 Comments

Working from the my last couple of EIGRP consists I am going to try and crystallize some of the material found by working through questions found in Stewart, B,D., Gough, C (2008). CCNP BSCI Official Exam Certification Guide, Fourth Edition. Indianapolis: Cisco Press.

Hub and Spoke Over Subscribed

The 256 kbps access line to the hub has 56 kbps access lines to each of ten spoke sites. Each link has a Frame Relay Committed Information Rate (COR) of 56 kbps. The access line to each router reflects the CIR. The access line to the hub router, Router A, is 256 kbps, but the CIR of the hub is the same as its access line.

From a Frame relay perspective, a circuit is considered oversubscribed when the sub of the CIRs of the remote circuits is higher than the CIR of the hub location. With ten links, each with a CIR of 56 kbps, this circuit is oversubscribed (56 kbps * 10 = 560 kbps).

  1. How much bandwidth has each circuit been allocated? why was this value chosen by the administrator?
    The maximum allowed bandwidth is controlled by the hub (256 kbps) in this hub-and-spoke network, because the maximum total spoke bandwidth is more than the hubs CIR (560 kbps), one cannot allow any individual Permanent Virtual Circuit (PVC) to utilize more than (256 kpbs / 10) 25 kbps at one time.
  2. What bandwidth utilization is available to EIGRP? why was this value chosen by the administrator?
    Because not much user data traffic is expected and the data rate is low one can allow EIGRP to use as much as 90% of the bandwidth.
  3. If Router A fails, what would the effect be on the network?
    If Router A fails there would be no communication between spoke sites as Router A is the hub. Each individual site would function but WAN connectivity would be lost. Each spoke router will stop receiving Hellos for the Hold time duration (3x Hello) and then and assume that the neighbours are dead. There not being any neighbours to ask for a route,the Topology Table will be updated and the router will send updates out about this change.
  4. Is summarization possible on the routers entering the WAN cloud, or is it possible on the network not shown in the figure that are on the other side of the routers? Give a reason for your answer.
    EIGRP allows summarization at the interface level (barring that the addressing scheme is such that it will allow this to happen). This is an advantage of EIGRP over OSPF (OSPF allows summarization only at Area Border Router (ABR))

Resources:

Stewart, B,D., Gough, C (2008). CCNP BSCI Official Exam Certification Guide, Fourth Edition. Indianapolis: Cisco Press.

Notes and Notices:

This is a part of my personal BSCI notes and research to assist myself in learning and understanding the concepts and theory for the BSCI exam. I learn by making notes reading and writing things down and wish to file them where I can’t lose them. These notes are not to be seen, judged or mistaken for replacements to Cisco recognized and authorized training which I personally support and attend and suggest you undertake if you are going for the BSCI Certification.

Enhanced Interior Gateway Routing Protocol – Scalable EIGRP – Scenario One

Published
by
Deon Botha
on September 10, 2008
in BSCI, BSCI Questions, Certification and Cisco Systems
. 0 Comments

Working from the my last couple of EIGRP posts I am going to try and crystallize some of the material found by working through questions found in Stewart, B,D., Gough, C (2008). CCNP BSCI Official Exam Certification Guide, Fourth Edition. Indianapolis: Cisco Press. The Scenario works from the EIGRP Technology White Paper Sections on Cisco.com

Frame-Relay Example

The above network is experiencing timeouts and network crashes. In addition, EIGRP appears to be losing routes from its routing tables, which is adding to the problem.

  1. What changes to addressing or EIGRP could affect the route drops and network problems? State the configuration commands necessary to activate this solution on Router A.
    Summarization is the keystone to scalable EIGRP operation. Summarization will limit the query range preventing query scoping. This will also prevent the routes in the Topology Table from being SIA, which affects performance.
    Enter Router Mode to Define Routing Protocol
    RouterA(config)#router eigrp 1
    Define EIGRP Network for Routing Protocol
    RouterA(config-router)#network 10.0.0.0
    Disable Auto Summarization
    RouterA(config-router)#no auto-summary
    This is me being strange and clean exiting from the routing protocol sub-section
    RouterA(config-router)#exit
    Enter the Serial Interface where to start defining your Hub on the Hub-and-Spoke Network
    RouterA(config)#interface serial 0/0
    Define summary for this interface
    RouterA(config-if)#ip summary-address eigrp 1 10.1.0.0 255.255.0.0
    RouterA(config-if)#exit
  2. The WAN is a Frame Relay cloud, and Router A is the hub in the hub-and-spoke configuration. Each Virtual Circuit (VC) is 56-kbps. Give commands to configure Router A for EIGRP over this Non-Broadcast Multi-Access (NBMA) Cloud.
    This Cisco.com Configuration Note should explain why the below is done.
    RouterA(config)#interface serial 0/0
    RouterA(config-if)#frame-relay encapsulation
    RouterA(config-if)#bandwidth 168
    RouterA(config-if)#exit
  3. Give the commands to configure Router B for EIGRP over this NBMA cloud.
    RouterA(config)#interface serial 0/0
    RouterA(config-if)#frame-relay encapsulation
    RouterA(config-if)#bandwidth 56
    RouterA(config-if)#exit

Resources:

Stewart, B,D., Gough, C (2008). CCNP BSCI Official Exam Certification Guide, Fourth Edition. Indianapolis: Cisco Press.

Notes and Notices:

This is a part of my personal BSCI notes and research to assist myself in learning and understanding the concepts and theory for the BSCI exam. I learn by making notes reading and writing things down and wish to file them where I can’t lose them. These notes are not to be seen, judged or mistaken for replacements to Cisco recognized and authorized training which I personally support and attend and suggest you undertake if you are going for the BSCI Certification.

Enhanced Interior Gateway Routing Protocol – Scalable EIGRP – bandwidth command on subinterfaces

Published
by
Deon Botha
on September 5, 2008
in BSCI, BSCI Questions, Certification and Cisco Systems
. 0 Comments

Working from the my last couple of EIGRP posts I am going to try and crystallize some of the material found by working through questions found in Stewart, B,D., Gough, C (2008). CCNP BSCI Official Exam Certification Guide, Fourth Edition. Indianapolis: Cisco Press.

On what occasion should you consider configuring the bandwidth on subinterfaces?

In multipoint networks where one differing speeds allocated to the Virtual Circuits (VCs), it is easier to manage and maintain the configuration when each VC is logically treated as its own interface or point-to-point link.

In this case the bandwidth command can be configured on each subinterface which will allow different speed VCs while maintaining optimum use of each. The links that have the same configured Committed information rate (CIR) are represented as a single subinterface with a bandwidth that reflects the aggregate CIR of all the circuits.

Resources:

Stewart, B,D., Gough, C (2008). CCNP BSCI Official Exam Certification Guide, Fourth Edition. Indianapolis: Cisco Press.

Notes and Notices:

This is a part of my personal BSCI notes and research to assist myself in learning and understanding the concepts and theory for the BSCI exam. I learn by making notes reading and writing things down and wish to file them where I can’t lose them. These notes are not to be seen, judged or mistaken for replacements to Cisco recognized and authorized training which I personally support and attend and suggest you undertake if you are going for the BSCI Certification.

Enhanced Interior Gateway Routing Protocol – Scalable EIGRP – Multipoint Serial Interfaces

Published
by
Deon Botha
on September 5, 2008
in BSCI, BSCI Questions, Certification and Cisco Systems
. 0 Comments

Working from the my last couple of EIGRP posts I am going to try and crystallize some of the material found by working through questions found in Stewart, B,D., Gough, C (2008). CCNP BSCI Official Exam Certification Guide, Fourth Edition. Indianapolis: Cisco Press.

If a multipoint serial interface uses five Permanent Virtual Circuits (PVCs) with Committed Information Rates (CIRs) of 56-, 128-, 128-, 128-, and 256-kbps, how would the bandwidth command be implemented on the interface?

EIGRP will assume even distribution of bandwidth on a multipoint interface. The bandwidth command serves two purposes in this situation,

IOS uses it as part of the routing metric and determines how much traffic it can send over an interface

One method method is to take the slowest PVC and calculate aggregate bandwidth

A better solution would be to split the PVC into subinterfaces so that each subinterfaces can be treated on its own.

Resources:

Stewart, B,D., Gough, C (2008). CCNP BSCI Official Exam Certification Guide, Fourth Edition. Indianapolis: Cisco Press.

Notes and Notices:

This is a part of my personal BSCI notes and research to assist myself in learning and understanding the concepts and theory for the BSCI exam. I learn by making notes reading and writing things down and wish to file them where I can’t lose them. These notes are not to be seen, judged or mistaken for replacements to Cisco recognized and authorized training which I personally support and attend and suggest you undertake if you are going for the BSCI Certification.

Enhanced Interior Gateway Routing Protocol – Scalable EIGRP – ip bandwidth-percent

Published
by
Deon Botha
on September 5, 2008
in BSCI, BSCI Questions, Bandwidth, CIR, Certification and Cisco Systems
. 0 Comments

Working from the my last couple of EIGRP posts I am going to try and crystallize some of the material found by working through questions found in Stewart, B,D., Gough, C (2008). CCNP BSCI Official Exam Certification Guide, Fourth Edition. Indianapolis: Cisco Press.

Explain the meaning of the command ip bandwidth-percent eigrp 63 100?

The purpose of the command ip bandwidth-percent eigrp 63 100 is when one has many Virtual Circuits (VCs) and there is not enough bandwidth at the access speed to support the aggregate bandwidth. The subinterfaces must be configured with a much lower speed than the real speed of the circuit.

For example on multiple Frame Relay links, lets say 5 in all, all with 64 kbps guaranteed (CIR) you know you can “garauntee” this aggregate 128 kbps bandwidth but , but when the sun shines, the wind blows in the right direction and everyone exhales at once in the office you might get more or less than 2 Mbits meaning aggregate bandwidth of 10 Mbits.

In this case we use ip bandwidth-percent eigrp 63 100 to indicate to the EIGRP process that it can still function, by adjusting it from the default 50% bandwidth to use 100% of the bandwidth (so EIGRP can use 256 kbps) for Autonomous-System 63 on the interface which it is configured. This is done because chances are very high that we are in most cases going to receive somewhere between 384 kbps and 512 kbps rather than our CIR of 128 kbps.

One uses this command because the bandwidth command does not reflect the true speed of the link.

Resources:

Stewart, B,D., Gough, C (2008). CCNP BSCI Official Exam Certification Guide, Fourth Edition. Indianapolis: Cisco Press.

Notes and Notices:

This is a part of my personal BSCI notes and research to assist myself in learning and understanding the concepts and theory for the BSCI exam. I learn by making notes reading and writing things down and wish to file them where I can’t lose them. These notes are not to be seen, judged or mistaken for replacements to Cisco recognized and authorized training which I personally support and attend and suggest you undertake if you are going for the BSCI Certification.

Enhanced Interior Gateway Routing Protocol – Scalable EIGRP – Frame Relay PVCs

Published
by
Deon Botha
on September 4, 2008
in BSCI, BSCI Questions, Certification, Cisco Systems and PVC
. 0 Comments

Working from the my last couple of EIGRP posts I am going to try and crystallize some of the material found by working through questions found in Stewart, B,D., Gough, C (2008). CCNP BSCI Official Exam Certification Guide, Fourth Edition. Indianapolis: Cisco Press.

Four Frame Relay Permanent Virtual Circuits (PVCs) exist on a multipoint interface. On the multipoint interface, the command bandwidth 224 is used. How much bandwidth will EIGRP assign to each PVC, and how much of that amount will EIGRP use for advertisements.

EIGRP will assign 56kbps to each PVC. The aggregate bandwidth calculation is 4 x n = 224 so working backwards you get 56 kbps.

EIGRP will use by default no more than 1/2 (50%) of 56 kbps which is 28 kbps.

Resources:

Stewart, B,D., Gough, C (2008). CCNP BSCI Official Exam Certification Guide, Fourth Edition. Indianapolis: Cisco Press.

Notes and Notices:

This is a part of my personal BSCI notes and research to assist myself in learning and understanding the concepts and theory for the BSCI exam. I learn by making notes reading and writing things down and wish to file them where I can’t lose them. These notes are not to be seen, judged or mistaken for replacements to Cisco recognized and authorized training which I personally support and attend and suggest you undertake if you are going for the BSCI Certification.

Enhanced Interior Gateway Routing Protocol – Scalable EIGRP – hybrid multipoint NBMA network

Published
by
Deon Botha
on September 4, 2008
in BSCI, BSCI Questions, CIR, Certification, Cisco Systems, NBMA and VC
. 0 Comments

Working from the my last couple of EIGRP posts I am going to try and crystallize some of the material found by working through questions found in Stewart, B,D., Gough, C (2008). CCNP BSCI Official Exam Certification Guide, Fourth Edition. Indianapolis: Cisco Press.

What is the preferred configuration for a hybrid multipoint non-broadcasting multi-access  (NBMA) network when one Virtual Circuit (VC) has a Committed Information Rate (CIR) of 56 kbps and the other five VCs each have a CIR of 256 kbps

The preferred configuration solution for a hybrid multipoint NBMA network in situations where one VC has a lower CIR than the other VC(s) is to configure the lower VC as a point-to-point subinterface using the CIR as the configured bandwidth.

Another subinterface configured as a multipoint interface should be created with the bandwidth equal to aggregate CIR of all other VC(s) (thus in this example 5 x 256 kbps = 1280 kbps).

Alternatively a solution much easier to configure, manage and use would be to each VC as a separate logical interface and configure all of them as point-to-point subinterfaces. The bandwidth command can then be applied to each subinterface which will allow for different speeds to be applied individually to each VC. In this configuration subinterfaces are configured for each VC and the CIR is configured as the bandwidth.

Resources:

Stewart, B,D., Gough, C (2008). CCNP BSCI Official Exam Certification Guide, Fourth Edition. Indianapolis: Cisco Press.

Notes and Notices:

This is a part of my personal BSCI notes and research to assist myself in learning and understanding the concepts and theory for the BSCI exam. I learn by making notes reading and writing things down and wish to file them where I can’t lose them. These notes are not to be seen, judged or mistaken for replacements to Cisco recognized and authorized training which I personally support and attend and suggest you undertake if you are going for the BSCI Certification.

Enhanced Interior Gateway Routing Protocol – Optional Configuration Commands for EIGRP – Tuning EIGRP

Published
by
Deon Botha
on September 2, 2008
in BSCI, BSCI Notes, Bandwidth, Certification, Cisco Systems and Hold Timer
. 0 Comments

Some South African/Anglo-African humour that is making me smile:

“Tune” to talk, especially to talk nonsense (“Are you tuning me?”)

But back to the topic at hand;

One can fine tune the EIGRP process in many ways. The most important of tuning methods would be the summarization of routes and load balancing. Other techniques however do exist and these include the frequency of the hello and hold timers and setting bandwidth.

The trade off to playing with timers would be that by decreasing hello traffic the network will take longer to  notice failures, which in turn will delays convergence.

To go over some stuff from previous posts; EIGRP only sends updates when a new route is advertised or an existing route is withdrawn (changes state to down). A Link failure causes an interface to change state without delay (duh). But when a failed neighbour is not directly connected (on the other side of a Ethernet switch for example), the only way to notice failure would be that no hellos are received. The idea and concept of Neighbourship is important in EIGRP because it alerts the router to topology changes and because the router is responsible to the rest of the network to publicize the lost routes.

When fiddling with timers think about the wider ramifications. In most cases defaults are there for a reason. Instead of improving performance the opposite will most probably happen. (I.E. timers are changed per interface and changing timers on one side of a link and not the other side creates problems with neighbourship that forms and dissolves periodically).

Timer Values are based on the speed of the interface. Because the timers are assumed to be based on this speed, they will usually be the same (Timers are not communicated between neighbours and are not a requirement for neighbourship).

If Router A has a hello interval of 5 seconds and a hold time of 15 seconds (3x hello) and Router B has a hello interval of 30 seconds and a hold time of 90 seconds (3x hello), then the two routers will be neighbours for 15 seconds and then down for 15 seconds.

The Hello Timer

Tuning the Hello Timer directly affect the ability of the EIGRP Process to notice a change in the state of a neighbour. Only after a router’s interface is recognized as being down, or a router has failed to hear from a neighbour after a certain amount of time, does the router declare the neighbour dead and take action to update the Routing Table and neighbours.

For the above stated reasons, use of the

Router(config-if)#ip hello-interval eigrp autonomous-system-number seconds

command is typically used to decrease (AND NOT INCREASE) the amount of time between Hellos to ensure that the network converges QUICKER and not SLOWER (which would be done by INCREASING THE TIME). This however means MORE traffic devoted to EIGRP and more space used by EIGRP.

The defaults are as follows:

  • High Bandwidth links (every 5 seconds)
    • Broadcast Media (Ethernet, Token Ring, FDDI)
    • Point-to-Point Serial Links (PPP or HDLC Leased Circuits, Frame Relay Point-to-Point subinterfaces, and ATM)
    • Point-to-point subinterfaces
    • High Bandwidth (T1/E1 and greater) multipoint circuits (ISDN PRI and Frame Relay)
  • Lower Bandwidth Links (every 60 seconds)
    • Multipoint Circuits (T1/E1 and slower, Frame Relay Multipoint interfaces, ATM multipoint interfaces, and ATM)
    • Switched Virtual Circuits and ISDN BRIs

The Command to set how often hellos are sent to neighbours is applied to an interface and does not affect the ENTIRE EIGRP process:

Router(config)#interface serial 0/0
Router(config-if)#ip hello-interval eigrp autonomous-system-number seconds

To use this in an example we can change the hello timer of a WAN link, that is running on EIGRP AS 1. Doing so will not affect other interfaces running EIGRP AS 1 only this particular WAN link.

Router(config)#interface serial 0/0
Router(config-if)#ip hello-interval eigrp 1 10

The Hold Timer

The Hold Time as talked about here and is how long a router will wait for a hello before pronouncing the neighbour unavailable/dead. By Default the hold time is 3 times the hello time. TAKE NOTE that by changing the hello interval does not automatically change the hold time.

The hold timer for an interface must be changed manually using the following command:

Router(config-if)#ip hold-time eigrp autonomous-system-number seconds

Using this in the same example as above for the Hello time:

Router(config)#interface serial 0/0
Router(config-if)#ip hold-time eigrp 1 30

Authentication

EIGRP support two kinds of Authentication, simple passwords and MD5 hashes.

  • Simple passwords are sent as plain-text and matched to the key on the receiver. Simple passwords are not secure, because any listener can see this traffic and read the key value.
  • Hash keys, sent as MD5 values, are secure because the listener cannot use the value in one transmission to compute the key.

Using MD5 authentication, the router generates a had value for every EIGRP transmission and checks the hash of every received EIGRP packet.

To specify MD5 Authentication:

Router(config)#interface serial 0/0
Router(config-if)#ip authentication mode eigrp autonomous system md5

Once the MD5 authentication is set now comes the key:

Router(config-if)#ip authentication key-chain eigrp autonomous system chain-name

Then the key-chain is configured and the key is specified:

Router(config-if)#key chain chain-name
Router(config-if)#key my-chain
Router(config-keychain-if)#key-string key

An example using the WAN interface from above:

Router(config)#interface serial 0/0
Hello Interval Set
Router(config-if)#ip hello-interval eigrp 1
10
Hold Interval Set
Router(config-if)#ip hold-time eigrp 1 30
MD5 Authentication Set
Router(config-if)#ip authentication mode eigrp 1 md5
MD5 Key Set
Router(config-if)#ip authentication key-chain eigrp 1 My-Chain
MD5 key-chain Set
Router(config-if)#key chain My-Chain
Router(config-if)#key 1
Router(config-keychain-if)#key-string cisco

Authentication results are not shown under show commands. A successful neighbourship means it works. You can however check command process using debug eigrp packets

Optional EIGRP Commands Over a WAN

EIGRP has some design and configuration issues when it comes to the WAN environment. In the WAN one must deal with limited capacity to a greater degree than at other points of the network (For example the LAN). EIGRP is limited in that it restricts its use of bandwidth to NO MORE than 1/2 the link capacity. This is superior to the considerations made by other protocols. Although EIGRP by default is usually sufficient, one might need to make small adjustments at times.

EIGRP Defaults in Bandwidth Utilization
Routers understand link capacity most of the time (MOST being important here). Serial interfaces are however problematic (and the exception to the rule) because they usually attach to a DSU. The router therefore assumes a default speed of 1544 kbps (which is in most cases on the WAN not true).

If the link is actually 56 kbps, then EIGRP would calculate incorrectly and -even limiting itself to 722 kbps -could saturate the link. This could result in dropped EIGRP and data packets because of congestion and dropped data.

The show interface command will allow you to check that the interface bandwidth is accurate. The output shows the configured bandwidth of the link.

Show Interface x

The set bandwidth does not actually affect the speed of the link, but this value is used for routing protocol calculations and load calculations. Using the following command you can set the bandwidth:

Router(config)#interface serial 0/0
Router(config-if)#bandwidth speed-of-line

Configuring Bandwidth over an Non-Broadcast Multi-access (NBMA) Cloud

EIGRP plays well over WANs, including point-to-point and NBMA environments like Frame Relay and ATM. The NBMA topology can include either point-to-point subinterfaces or multipoint interfaces.

Cisco IDs three rules when configuring EIGRP over an NBMA cloud:

  • EIGRP traffic should not exceed the committed information rate (CIR) capacity of the virtual circuit (VC).
  • EIGRP aggregated traffic over all the VCs should not exceed the access line speed of the interface.
  • The bandwidth allocated to EIGRP on each VC must be the in the same directions.

Configuring Bandwidth over a Multipoint Network

In addition to being used in the EIGRP metric, the bandwidth command influences how EIGRP uses NBMA VCs. If a serial line has many VCs in a multipoint configuration, EIGRP will assume that each VC has an even share of the bandwidth. EIGRP will confine itself to using half that share for itself. This won’t work if a 56 kbps link has bandwidth set to 128 kbps because EIGRP will assume 64 kbps is for it’s own use.

The bandwidth command should reflect the access-link speed into the Frame Relay cloud. Your company might have five PVCs from your routers serial interface, each carrying 56 kbps. The access link will need a capacity of 5 * 56 kbps (280 kbps).

Configuring Bandwidth over a Hybrid Multipoint Network

If the multipoint network has different speeds allocated to the VCs, a more complex solution is needed.

  • Take the lowest CIR and multiply it by the total number of circuits. Apply the product (total) as the bandwidth of the physical interface. The problem with this configuration is that EIGRP will underutilize higher bandwidth links.
  • If possible, it is muse easier to configure and manage an environment that has used subinterfaces, where a VC is logically treated as a separate interface. The bandwidth command can be configured on each subinterface, which will allow different speeds on each VC. In this solution, subinterfaces are configured for each VC and the CIR is configured as the bandwidth. This is the preferred solution.

Configuring a Pure Point-to-Point Network

If there are many VCs, there might not be enough bandwidth at the access speed of the interface to support the aggregate EIGRP traffic. The subinterfaces should be configured with a bandwidth that is much lower than the real speed of the circuit. In this case, it is necessary to use the bandwidth-percent command that indicates to EIGRP that it can still function.

The ip bandwidth-percent eigrp command adjusts the percentage of capacity that EIGRP may use FROM THE default 50%. You would use the command because the bandwidth command does not reflect the TRUE speed of the link (The bandwidth command might have been altered to manipulate the routing metric and path selection of a routing protocol).

Router(config)#interface serial 0/0
Router(config-if)#ip bandwidth-percent eigrp autonomous-system-number percent

Software Study Resources:

The Command Memorizer was originally developed by a CCIE Candidate (David Bombal) for his own use and is now available to anyone who wants to use it.Command Memorizer helped him pass the CCIE Lab on the first attempt, and although I am not a CCIE candidate “officially” I have fiddling with it and finding it useful to test my command line retention and overall progress towards CCIE readiness as I do my current CCNP.The proof will be in the pudding as the Command Memorizer boasts 1000s of commands and hundreds of scenarios to test command line knowledge and retention. It has a section for EIGRP and I also like knowing where I am on my long road to Cisco.

Like most study aids / study tools this tool / aid has a specific focus. The Command Memorizer only works when used in conjunction with theoretical backing because you need to know what a command does and how it relates to the technology area. IOW You need to make the connection before you can start drilling actual commands repetitively to get them to start flowing and become second nature.

For a disclosure statement on my relationship with Configure Terminal.

Cisco Press Resources:

Stewart, B,D., Gough, C (2008). CCNP BSCI Official Exam Certification Guide, Fourth Edition. Indianapolis: Cisco Press.

Internetworking Technology Handbook – Intro to the Wan

Notes and Notices:

This is a part of my personal BSCI notes and research to assist myself in learning and understanding the concepts and theory for the BSCI exam. I learn by making notes reading and writing things down and wish to file them where I can’t lose them. These notes are not to be seen, judged or mistaken for replacements to Cisco recognized and authorized training which I personally support and attend and suggest you undertake if you are going for the BSCI Certification.

BSCI Design Foundation – Network Models

Published
by
Deon Botha
on July 25, 2008
in BSCI, BSCI Notes, Certification, Cisco Systems, Concepts and Constructs, ECNM, Enterprise Architecture, IIN and SONA
. 0 Comments

Design – Hierarchical

Hierarchical Design

Where networks once were non-hierarchical (layer-1 design, layer-2 design, layer-3 design) they are generally now three-layer hierarchical in design (above). Cisco has been using this model for years and it gave a high-level overview of how a reliable network could be conceived but was largely conceptual because it did not provide specific guidance on “how-to” implement certain things, like:

  • Implementing redundancy,
  • Adding Internet Access,
  • Accounting for remote users,
  • Locating workgroup and enterprise services

Design – Enterprise Composite Network Model (ECNM)

Access-Distribution-Core ECNM

Revisions to the hierarchical design showed redundant distribution and core devices and connections to make the hierarchical model more fault tolerant. The switch block design (above) explained how redundancy fit into a network, but still did not really adequately specify other parts of the network design. This lead to the Enterprise Composite Network Model (ECNM) development to address the failures of both the hierarchical model and switch block model.

This ECNM is broken into three large pieces:

  • Enterprise Campus,
  • Enterprise Edge,
  • Service Provider Edge.

Enterprise Composite Network Model

ECNM – Campus

The enterprise campus looks very much like the above switch block design with some added details:

  • Campus Backbone (like the core layer of the hierarchical model),
  • Building Distribution,
  • Building Access,
  • Management,
  • Server Farm (Enterprise Services).

The ECNM Campus builds onto the Switch block design but gives specific guidance as to where to place servers and management equipment. Take note that the servers look like a switch block and are redundantly attached (dual-homed) to the switches (not really shown nicely in the diagram).

ECNM – Enterprise Edge

The Enterprise edge shows the connections that the enterprise has with the wide area (other networks) and include:

  • E-Commerce,
  • Remote Access,
  • Internet Connectivity,
  • WAN (Internal links to other branches).

ECNM – Service Provider Edge

The service provider edge includes the public networks that facilitate wide area (other networks) connectivity:

  • Internet Service Provider (ISP),
  • Public Switched Telephone Network (PSTN) for dialup,
  • Frame Relay, ATM, and PPP for private connections.

Multiplexing

Historically voice traffic used one set of circuits and data traffic another. Also if you wanted more than one “number” the telecommunications company installed another physical line to your premises. If you wanted access to a data network they installed a data line for that purpose.

With line technologies like the T-carrier system (USA, Japan, Korea) 24 pulse-code modulated (I don’t know need to ask one the engineers about this), time-division multiplexed speech signals are carried over 2 copper pairs. This type of technology saved the telecommunications companies a lot of money in building out subscriber lines. The problem with T1 as a technology is that it cannot adjust as the customer usage requirements changes (see E-carrier system for Europe and other countries).

As technology changes so does the requirements from that technology; Modern networks are designed to carry voice, video, enterprise applications, normal LAN traffic and management traffic all on the same single secure infrastructure (convergence). The traffic is forced (statistically multiplexed) to share access to the network.

Service-Orientated Network Architecture (SONA) and Intelligent Information Network (IIN)

As covered above “Multiplexing” described the idea of a converged network as a system that integrates what was previously disparate systems (voice, video, data). The traffic types usually found on a converged network would include, but may not be limited to:

  • voice signalling and bearer traffic,
  • Core application traffic (ERP and CRM),
  • Transactional traffic related to database interactions (SQL),
  • Network management traffic for monitoring and maintaining the network structure (including routing protocol traffic),
  • Multicast multimedia,
  • Other traffic (web, e-mail, file transfer).

Each of the above traffic types has its own requirements and expectations that govern its successful execution. These requirements include security, QoS, transmission capacity, and delay.

To support this kind of multiplexed traffic, Cisco routers are able to implement filtering, compression, prioritization, and policing (dedicating network capacity). Except for the filtering process these processes are collectively known as QoS.

As an alternative to QoS, Cisco has an ideal called the Intelligent Information Network (IIN). This vision describes a network that integrates network and application functionality cooperatively allowing the network to be “smart” about how it handles traffic to minimize the footprint of applications. The IIN evolution is described in three phases:

  • Phase 1: Integrated Transport, deals with a converged network, built along a similar fashion of the ECNM and based on open standards (cross-compatibility)
  • Phase 2: Integrated Services, posits virtualization of resources such as servers, storage and network access; to move to an “on-demand” model. Don’t think marketing/advertising “virtualization” think practical virtualization the ISR routers (routing, switching, voice, network management, security and wireless) designed as an aio (all-in-one) appliance and Vitalizing Servers (if you have proper designed for the job servers) you can’t be trying this on SMB servers or try recycling 10 year old technology and thinking “bargain let’s load 5 operating systems on this”.
  • Phase 3: Integrated Applications, using application orientated networking (AON) to make the network “aware” allowing the network to actively monitor and participate in service delivery.

Service-Orientated Network Architecture (SONA) is the practical application or “how-to” of IIN in enterprise networks. SONA breaks down IIN into three layers;

  • SONA Infrastructure Layer is basically the same as IIN Phase 1,
  • SONA interactive Services Layer maps to IIN Phase 2,
  • SONA Application Layer has the same concepts as IIN Phase 3.

Resources:

Aragoen Celtdra on BSCI: Network Architecture and Design

Notes and Notices:

This is a part of my personal BSCI notes and research to assist myself in learning and understanding the concepts and theory for the BSCI exam. I learn by making notes reading and writing things down and wish to file them where I can’t lose them. These notes are not to be seen, judged or mistaken for replacements to Cisco recognized and authorized training which I personally support and attend and suggest you undertake if you are going for the BSCI Certification.

Multilayer Switching Network

Published
by
Deon Botha
on April 4, 2008
in BCMSN, Certification, Cisco Systems, Concepts and Constructs and Enterprise Architecture
. 2 Comments

Multilayer Switching Network

Network Diagram

The diagram above shows the exact same network as the layer-3 design except with a few noteworthy changes where two of the layer-2 switches having been replaced with multilayer switches.

Why use this design

Multilayer Switching is hardware based switching and routing platform integrated into a chassis that would do everything a standard switch and router would do, in many cases frame and packet forwarding is done by the same hardware Application-specific integrated circuit (ASIC) and other specialized circuitry improving performance, reducing power consumptions and in turn costing less*.

With the previous layer-3 design one of the problems was high latency compared to the layer-2 design which has potential bridging loop problems. This MLS model has low latency with added hardware-based forwarding (“caching”), high-performance switching, high-speed scalability (huge filter tables), QoS and Security making it the best of both models.

NOTE: *hardware gives switches greater scalability, wire-speed performance, low latency, low cost, and high port density.

Why this design works

This design could be used to offload the following from central routers or a distribution router or to combine routing and switching functions at the distribution areas of the network:

  • Wire-speed communication (the theoretical maximum speed of the medium)
  • Lower Latency (lag)
  • Multiple switching paths (redundancy suppose? someone?);
  • Segmenting broadcast and failure domains;
  • Updating of the Management Information Base (MIB) statistics;
  • Destination-specific frame forwarding based on layer-2 information;
  • Forwarding paths based on layer-3 information;
  • Validation of layer-2 frame and layer-3 packet via checksum;
  • Verification of expiration and updates;
  • Application of network policy and security;
  • Optimal path determination (based on MAC source/destination, IP source/destination, Protocol, Port);
  • QoS (auto QoS);
  • VoIP (inline power);

This type of switch is more expensive than a layer-2 switch yet still not as expensive as a Router, the cost is definitely not considered cheap. Placement of this device within a network must be considered carefully otherwise the expense incurred would lead to a waste.

Why this design doesn’t work

The problem with single chassis devices is single point of failure. If there is a problem on the device (breakdown) or network problem (routing table) everything connected to the MLS goes down this means placing redundant devices and planning them carefully which increases costs. As I mentioned these devices are not exactly “cheap” therefore planning redundancy (multiple devices) becomes an expensive exercise.

Switches in a flat network are interconnected to provide inter-vlan routing functions. These redundant paths will create bridging loops thus running STP is imperative.

Because a MLS is all that and a bag of chips it may be way over the top to replace a router with one of these unless there is a really good reason or a really good discount involved.

Some Basics

Catalyst Switches (3560, 4500, 6500), can forward frames based on Layer-3 and Layer-4 information contained in packets. This is the basics of MLS. Cisco Catalyst switches have gone through two basic generations first being the route caching and then topology based.

Route caching required a route processor (RP) and a switch engine (SE). The RP processed the first packet of a flow of traffic to determine destination. The SE in turn listens for this first packet and destination then creates an entry in the MLS cache. The SE forward all subsequent similar entries based on this cache entry. This is known by Netflow LAN switching, Flow-based or demand-based switching and, “route once, switch many”.

Topology based uses specialized hardware. Layer-3 routing information builds and pre-populates a single database with the entire network topology. This database is then consulted so that packets can be forwarded at high rates. This is known as Cisco Express Forwarding (CEF) where a process running on the switch downloads routing table databases into the Forwarding Information Base (FIB).

Devices in this design

A Router is a layer-3 device that is used to interconnect network segments or broadcast domains. Routers must be configured to work and don’t work out the box. Each interface on a router segments collision and broadcast domains for devices on that network attached to that interface.

A Switch is a layer-2 device that is used to interconnect network components (workstations, servers, printers, other hubs, switches, routers, etc). Out the box a switch creates a single broadcast domain but can create multiple broadcast domains (VLANs). Each port on a switch is a separate collision domain.

A Multilayer Switch is a layer-2, layer-3, layer-3 device that is used to interconnect network components (workstations, servers, printers, other hubs, switches, routers, etc). Out the box this switch is like a layer-2 switch.

Notes and Notices:

This is a part of my personal BCMSN notes and research to assist myself in learning and understanding the concepts and theory for the BCMSN exam. I learn by making notes reading and writing things down and wish to file them where I can’t lose them. These notes are not to be seen, judged or mistaken for replacements to Cisco recognized and authorized training which I personally support and attend and suggest you undertake if you are going for the BCMSN Certification.

References I want to remember:

Hucaby, D. (2007). CCNP Self-Study: CCNP BCMSN Official Exam Certification Guide, Fourth Ed, Multilayer Switching with CEF (pages. 296–299). Indianapolis: Cisco Press.


Search

About

You are currently browsing the Network Ninja weblog archives for 'cir' tag.

Latest

RSS
  • Digital Growth with your Job
  • Open Shortest Path First – OSPF Fundamentals – Scenario
  • Open Shortest Path First – OSPF Fundamentals – Questions and Answers – Question 13
  • Open Shortest Path First – OSPF Fundamentals – Questions and Answers – Question 12
  • Open Shortest Path First – OSPF Fundamentals – Questions and Answers – Question 11
  • Open Shortest Path First – OSPF Fundamentals – Questions and Answers – Question 10
  • Open Shortest Path First – OSPF Fundamentals – Questions and Answers – Question 9
  • Open Shortest Path First – OSPF Fundamentals – Questions and Answers – Question 8
  • Open Shortest Path First – OSPF Fundamentals – Questions and Answers – Question 7
  • Open Shortest Path First – OSPF Fundamentals – Questions and Answers – Question 6

Archives

  • June 2009
  • April 2009
  • March 2009
  • February 2009
  • November 2008
  • October 2008
  • September 2008
  • August 2008
  • July 2008
  • June 2008
  • May 2008
  • April 2008

Categories

  • 802.11 (7)
  • 802.1Q (1)
  • 802.1X (1)
  • AAA (1)
  • Access Point (7)
  • ACL (4)
  • Addressing (3)
  • Asides (31)
  • auto-summary (3)
  • AutoQoS (1)
  • Bandwidth (2)
  • BCMSN (55)
  • BDR (2)
  • BGP (1)
  • BPDU Filtering (1)
  • BPDU Guard (2)
  • BPDU Root Guard (1)
  • BSCI (67)
  • BSCI Notes (18)
  • BSCI Questions (48)
  • Business (1)
  • Cabling and Equiptment (3)
  • CAM (1)
  • CCDA (1)
  • CDP (1)
  • CEF (1)
  • Certification (123)
  • CIDR (2)
  • CIR (2)
  • Cisco Systems (144)
  • Concepts and Constructs (76)
  • CoS (1)
  • Cost (3)
  • DAI (1)
  • DDNS (1)
  • Debug (2)
  • DHCP Snooping (1)
  • DHCP Spoofing (1)
  • DR (3)
  • DUAL (1)
  • Dynamic ARP Inspection (1)
  • ECNM (5)
  • EIGRP (5)
  • Enterprise Architecture (7)
  • EtherChannel (1)
  • GLBP (1)
  • Hello Timer (2)
  • Hold Timer (2)
  • Hot Standby Router Protocol (1)
  • HSRP (1)
  • IGRP (1)
  • IIN (2)
  • Inter-Vlan Routing (1)
  • Interconnection Technologies (2)
  • IP Source Guard (1)
  • IS-IS (1)
  • ISL (1)
  • LACP (1)
  • Link State Advertisements (2)
  • Load Balancing (2)
  • Loop Guard (1)
  • MAC Address Flooding (1)
  • MLS (1)
  • MSTP (1)
  • NBAR (1)
  • NBMA (1)
  • Off-Topic (12)
  • OSPF (18)
  • PAgP (1)
  • passive-interface (1)
  • PoE (1)
  • Port Security (1)
  • Priority (2)
  • Proxy ARP (1)
  • PVC (1)
  • QoS (2)
  • RIP (1)
  • RIPv2 (1)
  • Root Guard (1)
  • RSTP (1)
  • Show (6)
  • Software (1)
  • SONA (2)
  • SSH (2)
  • STP (5)
  • Stub Router (3)
  • summary-address (1)
  • Support (4)
  • Switch Spoofing (1)
  • TCAM (1)
  • Telnet (2)
  • Troubleshooting (1)
  • Trunk (6)
  • Unidirectional Link Detection (1)
  • VACL (3)
  • VC (1)
  • Vine (20)
  • VLAN (11)
  • VLAN Hopping (1)
  • VLSM (1)
  • VoIP (1)
  • VRRP (1)
  • VTP (4)
  • VTY (1)
  • Wireless (7)


Styled with Sawchuk

Powered by WordPressabc and K21.0-RC7

Entries Feed and Comments Feed

50 queries. 1.6650 seconds.